|
alexrex20 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
@bpitas The fact that the Dodge/GMC did worse than the Nissan has more to do with weight balance and driver skill, than anything else.
alexrex20 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
@bpitas actually, the GMC has the factory locker, the Dodge has factory LSD, and the Nissan had an ARB rear locker, though it was not engaged at the time. The Nissan basically had fully open diffs front and rear. The Nitto Terra Grapplers are awesome tires. They have excellent road manners, especially in the wet, yet they still perform rather well off road. It's no wonder why it's a top-selling all-terrain tire.
OfficerSheepDog (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
@skylord559 fucking amazing how naive you are.
monsterxx07 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
my ranger woulda climbed that
boy19931993boy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Of course the Nissan won.. SUVs are built for offroading, trucks are made for hauling. Dumbasses
MegaXXXTripleXXX (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Dodge and Nissan For The Win!!!!!
RoflWaffle21 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Really gmc 1500 was designed for mostly road use that's why it was so low. It won't be. Able to go uphill off road for shit. The 2500 are much higher and would be able to tackle the hill a hell of a lot better than the 1500 plus that Nissan looked like it was customized
oolcat1 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
GO NISSAN!
duperman91 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
@alexrex20 hahahahahahaha you have great responses |