BuscaPé, Líder en comparación de precios en América Latina
Preguntas y Analisis de Automoviles

Battle of the Bimmers: BMW M3 v BMW 135i v BMW 335i

 
<  

http://www.edmunds.com/insidel... you start sending us flaming e-mails complaining that a comparison between the 2008 Audi S5 and the 2008 BMW M3 Coupe is an obvious mismatch from the get-go, you should know a few things.Our first full test of the $53,000, all-wheel-drive 2008 Audi S5 was a bit of a revelation. With a 354-horsepower version of Audi's direct-injection 4.2-liter V8 under its hood, the voluptuous Audi S5 ran a 13.3-second quarter-mile at 104 mph, just 0.1 second and 2 mph shy of the 420-hp 2007 Audi RS4 sedan. What's more, the S5's slalom speed is within a couple mph of the harsh-riding RS-spec sedan. "It ran a 13.3? With that kind of speed, who needs a $67,000 RS4?" we asked ourselves.We believe so strongly in the 2008 Audi S5 that it earned our Inside Line's inaugural Editors' Choice Award.So we acquired (hastily perhaps) another 2008 Audi S5 and set it against the new 2008 BMW M3 Coupe, a car now fortified with V8 power for the first time. Speed-reading the specifications sheets of these two cars, they seem like natural rivals: the 354-hp, all-wheel-drive 2008 Audi S5 measured against the 414-hp, rear-wheel-drive 2008 BMW M3.But as it turns out, we gave the 2008 Audi S5 a bigger challenge than we had initially intended.

Channel: Autos & Vehicles
Uploaded: December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm
Autor: InsideLineVideo

Duracion: 04:03
Rating: 4.593932
Vistas: 934885
{page_title}

Video Thumbnail #1:






Video Url:


Embed Code:

x coches .com Video Comentarios

NandoNY177 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
M3 has 333 not 359 lol
doebino1 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The M3 is also fucking 10 years old.
amcheung10 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
@juancho939 my dad has the same 2002 e46 m3 and it faster than all of those cars but thats cuz he modified them and it only has 12k miles but yea i see ur point
juancho939 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
@amcheung10 yeah but the the E46 was like 5 years older than the 135i and the 335....plus the 300 HP range? that M3 has 356 BHP, that´s 49-50 more than the other two but they still managed to be faster....why? again, the M3 is older, much older
amcheung10 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
@juancho939 i think they chose the E46 m3 because it was in the 300HP range like the 335i and 135i
amcheung10 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Really? 0-60 on the M3 is 5.4? Its tested as 4.6 but i guess u guys did it differently.... but still.... 5.4? wtf
juancho939 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
the M3 was an E46....if it were the E92 things would be different
juancho939 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
LOVE MY 135i !!!!!
Dontakeitserionig (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
at least use a 2006 m3.
mistad77 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
@VivaLaNick335 i have a 2012 135I with the M sport package.... this car is not only a head turner... it is a dream to drive. nimble and quick.... and it does well into the 150MPH range.

Opiniones Videos Test Automoviles © 2007 All Rights Reserved.