RayzaBlayz (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

thumbs up for the lexus isC behind the audi 2:11

kevinmsft (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Btw what a terrible review... you spend 1 minute out of a <3 minute video to bitch about the T.Maybe you should get another job rather than doing car reviews.

kevinmsft (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

@aziqbal Wow BMW fan boy.... the world doesn't have enough of you.S4 0-60mph is 4.9 manual & DSG, M3 is 4.7 manual & 4.5 DSG. But M3 would be much faster around track because of better suspension, brake and OEM tires.

kevinmsft (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

@luvmakingfunofu M3 coupe starts at 60K is barebone, my friend just bought one fully equiped for 75K before sales and gas guzzler tax, that's some serious money. And RS5 which comes fully equiped is not much more expensive.V8 M3 is an amazing car, but it's not perfect. When the car just came out in 2008, there were actually reviews rating it worse than the discountinued RS4. Surprise! I guess all I am saying is BMW is great, but not the ultimate car TV ads portraits.

luvmakingfunofu (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

@Justinw580i Close, but not quite. A base S5 starts at $55k, $10,000 more than a base 335i coupe, or merely $3k less than the base M3 coupe. That means the S5 is much closer to the M3 than it is to the 335i. Performance wise, the M3 is leagues ahead of the S5 according to every journalist on the planet. Then there's the RS5 with it's $71k base price ($13k more than the M3), that according to journalists, STILL can't beat the M3 - not even in a straight line. I still love the S4 and RS5 though.

JayAZ (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

WTF Kind of review was this? Horrible..

elguapotetigre (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

 "T" means THUPERCHARGED!

krazyhartin (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Emm..T is for Turbo.

kameraguy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

that lexus probably wanted to race.

05front (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

@rstavila hey dumbass, its SUPERCHARGED! not TC.